4.5 KiB
name, description
| name | description |
|---|---|
| Linktree Setup Documentation | Documentation of the steps performed to set up the Next.js Linktree project. |
Linktree Project Setup
This document outlines all the modifications and setups performed during this session to create the Linktree-style website.
1. Data Configuration (lib/config.ts)
- Created a centralized configuration file to store profile information (Name, Description, and Avatar path).
- Defined a
linksarray holding details for each platform: Name, URL, description, and icon path. - Populated the links with Roblox, Discord Server, TikTok, and YouTube configurations.
2. Layout & UI Components (app/page.tsx & app/layout.tsx)
- Replaced the default Next.js boilerplate with a Linktree-style page.
- Integrated
shadcn/uicomponents (Card,CardHeader,CardContent, andButton) to create a polished and modern container design. - Replaced standard
<img>and<a>tags withnext/image(<Image>) andnext/link(<Link>) to ensure optimized loading and routing. - Tuned the Flexbox layout inside the
Buttoncomponents to ensure the icon and text are grouped neatly on the left side (flex-1), pushing theArrowRight(fromlucide-react) to the extreme right with a subtle hover animation. - Updated the root layout fonts to support
Anuphanfor Thai characters alongside the existingGeistfonts.
3. Docker Environment (Dockerfile & docker-compose.yml)
- Built a streamlined
Dockerfileutilizing theoven/bun:latestimage. The setup uses Bun for package installation (bun install), building (bun run build), and starting the app (bun start). - Set up a
docker-compose.ymlfile to run the Next.js container, mapping the host port8606to the container port3000(8606:3000) with a persistentunless-stoppedrestart policy.
4. Application Configuration
- Configured
next.config.tsto support specific dev origins (allowedDevOrigins). - Added utility scripts to
package.jsonto make running Docker easier (npm run upfordocker compose up -d --buildandnpm run logsfordocker compose logs -f).
This successfully provides a fully responsive, easily configurable, and containerized Next.js Linktree application.
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Merge with project-specific instructions as needed.
Tradeoff: These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.
1. Think Before Coding
Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.
Before implementing:
- State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
- If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently.
- If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
- If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.
2. Simplicity First
Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.
- No features beyond what was asked.
- No abstractions for single-use code.
- No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
- No error handling for impossible scenarios.
- If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
3. Surgical Changes
Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.
When editing existing code:
- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
- Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it.
When your changes create orphans:
- Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
- Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.
4. Goal-Driven Execution
Define success criteria. Loop until verified.
Transform tasks into verifiable goals:
- "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
- "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
- "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"
For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
1. [Step] → verify: [check]
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
3. [Step] → verify: [check]
Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification.
These guidelines are working if: fewer unnecessary changes in diffs, fewer rewrites due to overcomplication, and clarifying questions come before implementation rather than after mistakes.